STAXRIP TEMPLATES INSTALL
STAXRIP TEMPLATES UPGRADE

On I tried my luck again with the new version 1.7.0.0 (portable, 64-bit), with these results :

Unless they do something about - better portability & easier transfer of settings to the new version. The version 1.3.2 works well for me, & I will tray to avoid upgrades

STAXRIP TEMPLATES UPGRADE

So I skipped this upgrade & labelled it as an 'insignificant upgrade'. & the bug fixes seem to address issues that never bothered me. The new features seem to be mainly geared towards geeks Visual C++ redistributable, Java, AviSynth.Īlthough in the new version 1.3.4 'what's new' lays out a huge & seemingly impressive list,

STAXRIP TEMPLATES INSTALL

You will be prompted to install (!) newer versions of system components like & I am not in the mood to spend hours working on settings again, You will loose at least a half of Your customized settings , Making it harder to transfer the settings You customized (& this can take hours) to the next version.Īs a result, upgrading Stax Rip will cause the following : In addition, the Stax Rip developers are changing their settings all the time, Not just the ones included in the App sub-folder,īut also on installed parts of Your operating system. Partly because it depends on so many additional components, The program is very complicated by it's nature, On, I tried upgrading from version 1.3.2 to 1.3.4 (seems minor) - it was a total mess. Upgrading this program is a real pain in the ass ! However, portability is a complete disaster (there are many components that need to be installed). Again, the Faster preset is slower and delivers less compression than the Ultrafast preset, while Medium is looking like a solid bet for the smallest file size.I agree, great program, best results out there in most categories (e.g. Nvidia's HEVC encoder created a decent file size in a very fast time of just four minutes, at a whopping 158.6 frames per second. It's a similar story looking at encodes of The Big Bang Theory. From these results it's hard to see why you would bother encoding in H.264 unless you were more concerned about compatibility than compression. For those without a current-gen Nvidia GPU, the HEVC Ultrafast preset is looking good. The overall winner will still need to be determined by quality, but there are already some clear winners: Nvidia's HEVC encoder is the most efficient, and the HEVC Medium preset does the best job of compression. It's also more efficient than the HEVC Slow preset, but falls behind the Ultrafast preset, which delivers a 21% larger file in 63% less time. If you're after the smallest file possible, HEVC Medium beats my custom, excellent-quality H.264 settings in file size (it's 56% smaller) with an encode that took 38% longer. Also, looking at the Efficiency Score (final file size * encoding time) metric, which essentially evaluates the compression efficiency in a lower-is-best fashion, it clearly blows away the competition. It creates a slightly larger HEVC-encoded file than Handbrake's default H.264 settings in under half the time. It's also plainly obvious that the Nvidia HEVC encoder is significantly faster than anything else due to its hardware encoding advantage. Of course this says nothing about quality, which we will explore later, but purely based on this data it's very easy to remove the Faster and Slow presets from contention. Secondly, the x265 Slow preset was enormously slower than the Medium preset, while delivering a very similar file size.

Firstly, the x265 Faster preset was significantly slower than the Ultrafast preset, while actually delivering less compression.

Nvidia HEVC: CQP mode at default settingsįor our Game of Thrones test file, there is a lot that can be deduced from the above data.

HEVC Slow: x265 Slow Preset, QF 23, default otherwise.

HEVC Medium QF 15: x265 Medium Preset, QF 15, default otherwise.

HEVC Faster: x265 Faster Preset, QF 23, default otherwise.

HEVC Medium: x265 Medium Preset, QF 23, default otherwise.

H.264 Handbrake Deafult: x264 Very Fast, Main Profile, Level 4.0, QF 23.

H.264 Custom: Settings listed on, QF 23.

My personal rig was used for testing, which is equipped with a modest Intel Core i5-3570 quad-core CPU at 3.4 GHz, 16 GB of DDR3 memory, and an Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti.

Throughout the following section, all encodes were made using Handbrake with the settings as mentioned, with the exception of the Nvidia encodes, which were performed using StaxRip. Let's take a look at how the various encodes perform.

Staxrip Templates